Sale of

bovine leather

crown online casino

blackjack card game how many players You say this is not relevant?The game was not ‘rigged’, ‘gaffed’ or any other acronym for ‘fixed’, nor was it even ‘advertised’ as having 100% RTP as she and many crown online casinoof you have claimed.We have also had the self-righteous comments from the self-appointed ‘legal/compliance experts’ on the future of regulation, and what other regulators would have done etc etc. Read katie91’s opening statement.latest no deposit bonus codes for fair go casino If katie91 had started the thread with,‘Hey I am a bot designer using false online identities and for the last 6 weeks I have been tryin crown online casinog to cheat a game, but I have goofed and I now realise there is an error on the paytable, but by the time I worked this out my bot had turned over nearly ￡400k and lost me over ￡12k, will you help me get my money back by saying the company are cheats?’Would she have got the same reaction? Is this accurate description of events not a bit more relevant that the 14 entries ‘she’ made to con you all? We are where we are because ‘she’ lied to you, end to end, and because I have taken the trouble to correct that situation, whereas other weighed in behind her without asking obvious questions. It looks as if the ‘top rated’ casino commentary site cannot accept what well established rules say, and how they are applied by all regulators. It wasfree spins no deposit bonus

playamo casino no deposit bonus code

live casino in baltimore You say this is not relevant?The game was not ‘rigged’, ‘gaffed’ or any other acronym for ‘fixed’, nor was it even ‘advertised’ as having 100% RTP as she and many crown online casinoof you have claimed. Even Bryan seems to be in that category.A number of CM users put katie91 and her so called evidence on a pedestal, built their arguments around her claims without checking them out properly, wanting to believe what she had written, and now they find it impossible to admit they were had over by a con-man and got this whole episode wrong. ‘She’ is the one who treats you with contempt, sets out to mislead you, who abuses your trust and lies to you, about who she is, what she has done, why she has done it, who with, what she expects, how you can help her, and more besides.A number of CM users put katie91 and her so called evidence on a pedestal, built their arguments around her claims without checking them out properly, wanting to believe what she had written, and now they find it impossible to admit they were had over by a con-man and got this whole episode wrong.We have also had the self-righteous comments from the self-appointed ‘legal/compliance experts’ on the future of regulation, and what other regulators would have done etc etc.free slots with bonus real money

royal ace casino new player no deposit bonus

no deposit codes for havana casinoI have been heavily criticised in the second thread for addressing katie91’s behaviour. If katie91 had started the thread with,‘Hey I am a bot designer using false online identities and for the last 6 weeks I have been tryin crown online casinog to cheat a game, but I have goofed and I now realise there is an error on the paytable, but by the time I worked this out my bot had turned over nearly ￡400k and lost me over ￡12k, will you help me get my money back by saying the company are cheats?’Would she have got the same reaction? Is this accurate description of events not a bit more relevant that the 14 entries ‘she’ made to con you all? We are where we are because ‘she’ lied to you, end to end, and because I have taken the trouble to correct that situation, whereas other weighed in behind her without asking obvious questions. It wasonline poker zonder geld Advertising is ‘in your face’, like the very small number of 100% RTP PFR games which are ‘advertised’ and promoted as such by very few operators, and which require perfect strategy to stay even and do not include slot games so far as I recall. Is there a message there? As for the UKGC’s comments, the full correspondence has never been disclosed, but by any measure of regulators’ behaviour they appear to have acted partially and with undue, ill-considered haste in this matter, quickly and incorrectly treading in other jurisdictions’ affairs, effectively endorsing the findings of a non-authorised, non-approved ‘testing person’ instead of crown online casinoraising their own queries; so they too are now aligned with the cheating side of this argument.I have been heavily criticised in the second thread for addressing katie91’s behaviour.casino slots machines for sale